Unemployment requirements: the new poll tax?
Via Mick, I see that I somehow missed a Barbara Ehrenreich op-ed in Saturday’s NYTimes. Mick makes some good points but I’d like to focus on one small part of Ehrenreich’s story about a married couple brutalized by the economy.
Delaware does not require fingerprints, but the Parentes discovered that they were each expected to apply for 40 jobs a week, even though no money was offered for gas, tolls or babysitting. In addition, Kristen had to drive 35 miles a day to attend “job readiness” classes, which she said were “a joke.”
WTF? Forty freaking applications a week? That’s 6+ applications a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year. Speaking as a former professional resume writer, at my letter writing peak I would have found that to be a crushing workload. An interview can chew up half a day all told, not to mention follow up letters and thank you’s.
This requirement is blatantly unConstitutional, placing as it does a massively unreasonable burden on the unemployed. Not to mention the $40 a week the Parentes are forced to spend on postage, or the fact that this law forces them to buy daily newspapers AND have internet access. No one could possibly apply for 40 jobs a week based on what’s in a daily newspaper’s help wanteds because there aren’t that many openings. There just aren’t.
Delaware is an abomination and this law is an unspeakable bit of barbarism that I’m sure allows the state to disqualify 100% of applicants for assistance.
And yes, those “classes” are ALWAYS a joke. They’re never taught by anyone who’s had to find new work in the last decade, and the advice given is often contrary to common sense or any kind of winning job search strategy.
Listening to the Sotomayor hearings in the car and on TV, it never occurred to me that the sanctimonious lying bullshit coming from Kyl, Graham and Cornyn wouldn’t be my lead-off rant. That was before I read Ehrenreich.
The Republicans have set up new rules of law that protect government from having to deliver services in pretty much the same way healthcare insurers duck responsibility for paying claims.
Laissez-faire America is an America that exists for the rich, and fuck the rest of us.
Each day my heart grows colder. Each day I wonder if I shouldn’t just be preaching the gospel of killing the rich, stoning the hypocrites, and socially ostracizing rank and file Republicans.
Today I’m inclined to preach the gospel of wait and see, but I can’t promise I can remain patient when average Americans’ problems are so pressing.
-
I do like the fact that the Dems are pounding on Chief Justice Roberts’ activist court today, and pushing the “modesty” meme.
By any reporting cited, Judge Sotomayor is a modest judge, both professionally and personally. What better word to use to contrast Sotomayor’s sane approach to the law with the reckless and hypocritical Republicans? Or the feckless abomination that is major media news “reporting“?
-
Jeff Sharlet on how The Family helped turn Somalia into an abattoir.
-
Max Blumenthal has a great post up on how Palin’s leaving Alaska in such a mess that the legislature may have to reconvene (at great expense) to sort out the succession mess stemming from Palin picking a new Lt. Governor, a power that she doesn’t actually have.
From the right, in Palin’s defense we have Pat Buchanan advising Todd Palin to murder Levi Johnston.
No, that’s not a joke although Pat thought it was pretty funny as did Mark Halperin. More on Levi Johnston from Audrey.
Over at Balloon Juice Tim F. says Palin’s getting ready to initiate a civil war within the Republican party to purge it of its weak sisters. Not a bad idea, especially if they shoot the survivors.
The Hill goes even further, and says Palin may campaign for Democrats. More shocking, they learn that Todd and Track Palin aren’t Republicans. (But the rest of us are all bad people for thinking the Palins’ whackjob Alaska Independence party affiliations are no big deal.)
I have yet to hear anything about the Palins that doesn’t make them sound like a Euro-porn version of Dogpatch.
-
Jeff Huber dissects the NYTimes’ coverage of Iran.
Needless to say, the coverage isn’t exactly what you would hope for.
A new study purports to show how newspapers lead and blogs follow, but Scott Rosenberg wisely points out that the “news” cited wasn’t news at all, just political soundbytes and in that context, yes, newspapers are unquestionably the leaders of the pack.
More from Derek Kerton on how news is reported.
In other news of the news media, Businessweek’s blog reports that Businessweek is up for sale.
-
Had Obama gone after the Bush-Cheney war criminals from the get go, Congress would have been paralyzed and I believe the right would be in open insurrection by now. Instead Obama coopted the right, and they are at their weakest point since the Great Depression.
Now is exactly the time for Eric Holder to “break” from the administration to do what has to be done, and what better thread to pull first than illegal surveillance of Americans?
Billmon’s back (again), and is calling Bush-Cheney the Addington Administration.
More from Digby.
-
Apparently the coup plotting started months ago, which pretty much means that everything you’ve read in the American press has been sanitized for your informational protection.
-
More Republican lies:
Al Franken and Scare America
Freepers not backing off on claims that Malia Obama is a typical street whore
Profit is not something you make by exploiting markets, profit requires that you make a product or service that benefits the public
Gitmo was about justice
-
If you haven’t seen the Bill Moyers’ interview with Wendell Potter, here are your options:
-
Dusty Trice amps up the rhetoric on Brodgate (the etymology can be traced to Laura Brod or Michael Brodkorb — with either name being, um, interesting discussionwise).
We have, however, reached the MDE tipping point for Dustytrice.com. It’s now time for Mr. Trice to publicly state for the record who, if any, politicians or organizations he’s getting money from.
Same rules as the online left insisted on for Brodkorb, and yes, Brodkorb lied and cheated a lot on this one.
It’s probably not too early for me to remind everyone that I don’t get paid to do Norwegianity, that I’m not active in the DFL (although I do caucus for informational purposes), and that since moving to Minnesota the only money I’ve earned from politics was when I blogged for City Pages, and then Ford Bell’s short-lived campaign. I’ve received less than $1,000 in blog donations, and there was absolutely zero quid pro quo attached to those donations.
I don’t really give a fuck if the Republican bloggers disclose anything, but I think it’s time for Democratic bloggers to start the 2010 cycle caveats and disclosures process. The Brod-Seifert civil war is what it is, and more important, about what will never be. More important is for the new gatekeepers to ‘fess up to their leanings, allegiances, and paid dalliances.
No names, but there are Democratic bloggers I don’t link to because of their unadmitted affiliations and/or extraordinary ambitions.
Disclosures please. As many as possible, and the sooner the better especially as Spotty and Robin and many others are already sharpening their long knives.
For the record, I’m strongly leaning to Margaret Kelliher, and if not her, maybe John Marty. None of the other candidates appeal to me in the slightest although I really don’t know squat about Thissen, Bakk or Rukavina.
And no, I don’t think bloggers have any more right to get righteous about the endorsement process than the non-blogging DFLers. Endorsement prior to a public vote (i.e., primary) is anathema, and the DFL selection process is broken, fucked up, half dead, and stinks like a corpse flower in full bloom.
No process that privileges activists over rank and file voters is democratic or desirable. Activists always have an advantage (try winning an election without them sometime). Giving them privileges on top of their natural advantages is as profoundly anti-Democratic as it gets.
Or, as Jeff Sharlet might have said had he ever lived in Minnesota, if you meet the DFL on the road, kill it.
-
Local voices not heard from in a while:
-
Years ago when I was back in college but before I started counseling job seekers, I had an acquaintance who was flunking out because of test anxiety. It was a nervousness thing and I recommended meditation. He was Christian and wanted no part of that, so instead I talked him into cussing before each test. At length, and colorfully.
What I did was teach him how to meditate by swearing. It worked for him and his test scores went from D’s to B’s almost overnight.
Now Cory Doctorow reports that a study shows that swearing can help alleviate pain.
No shit?
Sounds to me like cussing while driving is more therapeutic than the anti road rage crowd lets on.
-
-
Another way in which copyright enriches all our lives.
-
Still unraveling the hell caused by phony claims of child abuse during divorce custody hearings.
If there’s a villain in custody hearings, it’s usually the dad. That doesn’t mean it’s always the dad.
-
-
Tags: healthcare insurance, Honduras, Iran, punishing the poor, Sarah Palin, Sotomayor, surveillance, The Family, Thune blogging
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
July 13, 2009 at 12:55 pm
The only payment I’ve received was a free t-shirt from Drinking Liberally. I gave it to my Dad, though.
July 13, 2009 at 1:30 pm
Drinking Liberally obviously owns your dad now.
July 13, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Unless, of course, he’s wearing it ironically.
July 13, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Where he lives, even wearing it ironically could get a guy shot.
July 13, 2009 at 3:07 pm
It’s my personal blog and I write it for my own enjoyment. My last paying campaign gig was on Team Franken and I also list my campaign history on my ‘About’ page. No plans to work as a staffer on any campaigns in 2010. I’m just cranky and figured out how to use WordPress, Twitter and Facebook.
July 13, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Well, do us all a favor and slap that information into your About section. As well as anything you care to tell us about who you’re supporting in ‘10.
Transparency is a Democrat’s best friend.
July 14, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Dusty’s response left some holes. He’s spending a lot of time traveling around with a video camera, working on what he calls “projects.” I suspect he’s not doing all this work and travel on his own nickel. All he said was he wasn’t working for a campaign. He didn’t say he wasn’t getting paid by someone or organization. He hasn’t told the whole story, I don’t think.
Transparency is everybody’s best friend.
July 15, 2009 at 9:30 am
Let me fill in the holes. I’m not getting paid to blog. It’s my personal blog. Same as MDE.
Good point on 2010, Mark. I am not backing anyone in the 2010 Guv race. I will be remaining neutral.
July 16, 2009 at 8:40 am
Dusty Trice Says:
“Good point on 2010, Mark. I am not backing anyone in the 2010 Guv race. I will be remaining neutral.”
Neutral my ass, you just ran a hit piece on Pat Anderson. Any other lies you care to disclose.
July 16, 2009 at 10:19 am
Dusty,
You’re just not telling the whole story and you’re going to great lengths not to.
You are clearly getting paid by someone or some organization with an interest in disparaging Republicans. Who is it?
July 16, 2009 at 10:46 am
LET’S TRY PLAYING BY SOME OBJECTIVE RULES HERE. NO ONE GETS TO CHALLENGE ANYONE’S SINCERITY UNLESS:
1) YOU HAVE FULLY DISCLOSED WHO YOU ARE SUPPORTING FOR GOVERNOR.
2) YOU STATE UNEQUIVOCALLY YES OR NO WHETHER YOU ARE BEING PAID BY ANYONE.
3) YOU EXPLAIN TO ME WHY I’VE NEVER SEEN YOU COMMENT HERE UNTIL NOW.
THIS IS NOT AN OPEN FORUM, IT IS MY FORUM AND I DO NOT MUCH CARE FOR NEWBIES WHO USE MY SPACE TO CRITICIZE PEOPLE WITHOUT EXPLAINING FIRST WHO THEY ARE AND WHAT THEIR STANDING IS IN ALL OF THIS.
BOTH MAJOR MINNESOTA POLITICAL PARTIES ARE INFESTED WITH SOME OF THE WHINIEST ASSBITERS I’VE EVER ENCOUNTERED IN MY 35 YEARS OF POLITICAL ACTIVISM. I WILL NOT TOLERATE ASSBITING OF ANY KIND IN THESE THREADS. I LET YOU PEOPLE SWEAR, FART, BELCH, WHATEVER, BUT I HAVE NO TOLERANCE FOR CONCERN TROLLS.
July 17, 2009 at 5:34 am
No problem Mark.
I am supporting no candidate at this point. It’s way to early for me to decide. There are candidates like MAK, Chris Coleman, and Entenza, that I know I won’t support because I despise them.
I never have been paid by any candidate or campaign. I am being paid by no one. I have never even been a volunteer for anything but city council and school board campaigns.
My support for who ever I end up choosing will be limited to my vote an possibly I may write in support of that candidate and/or give a small donation.
You have never seen me comment hear before because I never hear of you blog before MDE linked to it. How many hits do you get a week, ten? You owe Ryan Flynn a hat tip.
Finally, fuck you Mark. I won’t give a rat’s ass if you delete my post. You are a D-list blogger and your blog has about the most fucked up formatting I’ve ever seen. Kiss my ass and have a nice day.
July 17, 2009 at 7:02 am
Always nice to know who the new kids are, even if they don’t have a clue about anything outside of their own tiny little inbred universe.
July 13, 2009 at 3:29 pm
“Today I’m inclined to preach the gospel of wait and see, but I can’t promise I can remain patient when average Americans’ problems are so pressing.”
I say!
Pertinence and patience should end loudly and abruptly when the need for “legitimacy” becomes the only motivation of those in power.
There is no fucking credibility left what are you waiting for? Fuck participation, time for some creation. The need for triage is long over the system is dead, time for the leap of consciousness and all the necessary frightful realities of an open debate.
July 13, 2009 at 3:31 pm
But, otoh, if I’m right, it just means that Obama’s been slowly moving his pieces into place so that once he moves on several key issues, he’ll win and not just blow the joint up.
Do not strike at a King unless you intend to kill him should be amended to: Do not strike at the establishment unless you know you can kick their warty gray-haired asses!
July 13, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Indeed…and perhaps…
But does he want to win or simply perpetuate “hope” for civilities sake? Do we really need any Kings? Do we really need an “establishment” that is so obtuse and crafted that no entity is responsible and every entity is necessary?
Open the door and then tear the fucker off its hinges and use it as a symbolic platform to roll out the new blueprints.
Otherwise its just a very long trip down more rabbit holes. Time to make the journey and admit there will be a great deal of improvising and survival skills needed along the way because this there is no way the weight can be lifted by the passengers alone and some new tools need to be created and some old assumptions need to be put to rest.
July 13, 2009 at 5:25 pm
I clicked the Unscientific America link, and I have a little crush on the woman who co-wrote it now. MS in marine biology = *starry eyed*.
July 14, 2009 at 2:01 pm
As I announced at the time I received the check in February, I received a travel grant from the Alliance for a Better Minnesota to attend the Transparency Camp sponsored by the Sunlight Foundation at the end of February/March 1.
That’s the only financial assistance I’ve received in connection with Bluestem Prairie. The research and writing are my own unless identified otherwise.
The site has been relaunched as a multi-author blog, but for now I remain unpaid and unaffiliated. Any affiliations on the part of contributors is duly noted at the end of each submitted piece.
Should the financial situation/sponsorship/whathaveyou change, it will certainly be announced to the readers. Should I obtain employment at–or consulting contracts with–a nonprofit, elected official, campaign, or political action group, such information will be duly noted on the About page, and at the close of any post in which the material is related to my employer or client.
When I write about an organization in which I am a member–say the Audubon society or the Minnesota Farmers Union–I note my membership.
The site contains a disclosure page: http://www.bluestemprairie.com/about.html
As for governor, haven’t narrowed my choice yet, but MAK, Rybak, C. Coleman, Thissen are contenders and I still haven’t dismissed Bakk or Marty.
Any questions?
July 15, 2009 at 9:20 am
[...] for the record who, if any, politicians or organizations he’s getting money from.” Source: Norwegianity, July 13, [...]
July 15, 2009 at 9:41 am
I left a comment over at MDE. Funny how they can’t read the comments of the posts they link to, but getting at the truth isn’t a real high priority over there.
I wrote the anger v hate stuff, btw, before I saw their post. Truth is always a great defense against hyperpartisanship.
July 15, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Ok, time for me to ‘fess up. Trice, Gisleson, and a few others whose identity will be revealed in time are all my kept men.
July 15, 2009 at 4:30 pm
True dat, but if you mention so much as one word about your strap-on collection I’m deleting all your comments going back to the twice removed incarnation of this blog.
July 15, 2009 at 5:45 pm
You left a comment at MDE? Have they called you dumbass, gay or accused you of being someone else yet?
July 15, 2009 at 5:48 pm
The usual suspect called me a mongrel and made up some number of how many times I’ve used the n-word here. I tried to reply but ran afoul of the content auto-censor and now can’t comment. [tried to post a link that included the search term]
But I left several comments before that, trying to be helpful by addressing all of their points. Hatefully, of course.